Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Rene Garcia, Defendant-Appellant.
Jenay Nurse Guilford, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Frances Weil of counsel), for appellant.
Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Michelle Pomerantz of counsel), for respondent.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Steven J. Hornstein, J.), rendered June 3, 2024, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, and sentencing him to a jail term of eight months, to run concurrently with his sentence under Indictment No.
, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant's waiver of his right to appeal does not preclude review of his Second Amendment claim (see People v. Johnson, — NY3d —, 2025 N.Y. Slip Op 06528, *2 [2025] ). Defendant also has standing to raise his challenge to the constitutionality of New York's firearm licensing scheme, notwithstanding that he never applied for a firearm license (Johnson, 2025 N.Y. Slip Op 06528, *3; see also People v. Jacobs, — AD3d —, 2026 N.Y. Slip Op 00591 [1st Dept 2026] ). However, defendant's challenge to the “good moral character” provision in Penal Law § 400.00(1)(b) is unpreserved because he failed to raise it below (see People v. Cabrera, 41 NY3d 35, 42–51 [2023] ), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we reject it on the merits (seePeople v. Mazyck, 246 AD3d 520 [1st Dept 2026]; People v. Guzman, 237 AD3d 570, 571[1st Dept 2025],lvdenied 44 NY3d 993 [2025] ).
Defendant's contention that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance in failing to raise a challenge to the “good moral character” provision of New York's gun licensing scheme is “unreviewable on direct appeal, as it involves matters not reflected in the record, and must be raised in a CPL 440.10 motion” (People v. Gray, 230 AD3d 1039, 1039 [1st Dept 2024], lv denied 42 NY3d 1035 [2024]; see also Jacobs, 2026 N.Y. Slip Op 00591). As an alternative holding, to the extent that the record allows review, we find that counsel did not render ineffective assistance (see People v. Caban, 5 NY3d 143, 152 [2005] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 6271
Decided: April 07, 2026
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)