Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Leuris MORALES, Defendant–Appellant.
Judgments, Supreme Court, New York County (Ann Scherzer, J.), rendered May 19, 2023, convicting defendant, upon his pleas of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and conspiracy in the fourth degree under indictment No. 2029/21, criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree under indictment No. 72246/22, and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree under indictment No. 70750/23, and sentencing him to concurrent jail terms of 6 months and 5 years of probation on indictment Nos. 72246/22 and 2029/21, and 3 months and 5 years of probation on indictment No. 70750/23, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of striking the condition of probation requiring him to pay surcharges and fees under each indictment, and otherwise affirmed.
Defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal (see People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545, 559 [2019], cert denied 589 U.S. 1302 [2020] ), which forecloses review of his excessive sentence claim (see People v Nunez, 220 AD3d 597, 597 [1st Dept 2023], lv denied 41 NY3d 1004 [2024] ). As an alternative holding, we perceive no basis for reducing his sentence.
“[D]efendant's challenge to the condition of probation requiring that he pay the mandatory surcharge and court fees survives his waiver of the right to appeal” (People v Percy, 234 AD3d 619, 620 [1st Dept 2025] ). We strike the condition of defendant's probation requiring that he pay the mandatory surcharges and court fees as it is not reasonably related to defendant's rehabilitation, nor necessary to ensure that he will lead a law-abiding life (id. at 620). We note the People do not oppose this relief.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 6071–, 6072–, 6073
Decided: March 12, 2026
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)