MEJIA v. TU STILO SALON SPA (2026)

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York,

Tania M. MEJIA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TU STILO SALON SPA, Defendant-Respondent.

571471 /25

Decided: January 15, 2026

PRESENT: James, P.J., Tisch, Perez, JJ.

Judgment (Rena Malik, J.), entered on or about January 30, 2025, affirmed, without costs.

The amount of the damage award issued in plaintiff's favor upon the trial of this small claims action achieved “substantial justice” (CCA 1804, 1807) and was neither inadequate nor unreasonable. There is no record support for any additional recovery, particularly in the absence of competent evidence establishing that the spa services rendered were defective and sufficient proof of damages beyond the amount paid.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.

Per Curiam.

All concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network