Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
David PLOTKIN, etc., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. AVON DEVELOPMENT ENTERPRISES CORP., et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.), entered August 27, 1996, which denied defendants' motion to vacate a default judgment entered against them, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Appeal from judgment, same court and Justice, entered January 30, 1996, upon defendants' default, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a non-appealable paper.
Defendants fail to make the required showing of lack of notice of the action in time to defend under CPLR 317 or excusable default under CPLR 5015(a) (see, Associated Imports v. Amiel Publ., 168 A.D.2d 354, 562 N.Y.S.2d 678, lv. dismissed 77 N.Y.2d 873, 568 N.Y.S.2d 915, 571 N.E.2d 85). The summons and complaint were served on or about June 15, 1995. Plaintiff's attorney sent letters to defendants at the end of July advising them that they were in default and that he would enter a default judgment in 10 days if they did not answer. This led to prompt contact between plaintiff's attorney and an attorney who advised the former that defendants were not yet certain as to how they wanted to proceed, but who did not request an extension of time to answer. The failure of this attorney to find the proof of service in the court's file and his three-day illness from August 31 to September 2 do not explain defendants' continuing default through August, and his forgetfulness after his part-time return to the office does not explain why defendants did not oppose plaintiff's motion for a default judgment made on notice in late September, or why they did not seek to have the January 1996 default judgment vacated until in or around April 1996 (see, Grosso v. Hauck, 99 A.D.2d 750, 471 N.Y.S.2d 662). We have considered defendants' other arguments and find them to be without merit.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 11, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)