IN RE: the CITY OF NEW YORK (2025)

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lyle E. Frank, J.), entered on or about March 25, 2024, which granted City of New York's petition for an order directing respondent TD Bank, N.A. to turn over to it $59,749.17 held in a joint account owned by respondents Chana Eisner and “Jada” Nadel, in partial satisfaction of several judgments awarded to the City against respondent Chana Eisner, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of amending the caption to substitute Jana Nadel in place of respondent “Jada” Nadel, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The City satisfied both prongs of the analysis required under CPLR 5225(b) by demonstrating that Eisner had an interest in the TD Bank account and that the City had enforceable judgments against Eisner (see Matter of New York Community Bank v. Bank of Am., N.A., 169 A.D.3d 35, 37–38, 93 N.Y.S.3d 7 [1st Dept. 2019], lv denied 33 N.Y.3d 908, 2019 WL 2461347 [2019]).

The caption should be amended to reflect respondent Nadel's first name as “Jana,” since Eisner neither opposes the request nor raises any arguments regarding potential prejudice to herself or Nadel if the request is granted (see CPLR 2001;  see also Cupka v. Remik Holdings LLC, 202 A.D.3d 473, 475, 163 N.Y.S.3d 22 [1st Dept. 2022]).

We have reviewed Eisner's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.