Dmitry Kruglov, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Holland America Line, N.V., Defendant-Respondent. (2025)

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York,

Dmitry Kruglov, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Holland America Line, N.V., Defendant-Respondent.

570862 /25

Decided: October 16, 2025

PRESENT: Tisch, J.P., Perez, Alpert, JJ.

Per Curiam.

Appeal from order (Shahabuddeen A. Ally, J.), dated October 16, 2024, dismissed, without costs, as taken from nonappealable paper.

Inasmuch as no appeal lies from the denial of a motion to reargue (see Smith v Pereira, 176 AD3d 491, 492 [2019]) and no appeal has been taken from the original October 13, 2021 order dismissing the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction, or the July 8, 2024 order, which, upon renewal and reargument, adhered to that determination, plaintiff's arguments addressed to those determinations are not properly before us (see Stratakis v Ryjov, 66 AD3d 411, 411-412 [2009]).

Plaintiff's remaining contentions are unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.

I concur I concur I concur

Decision Date: October 16, 2025

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network