Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Javier ROSARIO, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph A. McCormack, J., at speedy trial motion; Naita A. Semaj, J., at Second Amendment motion; Albert Lorenzo, J., at plea and sentencing), rendered January 6, 2023, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of five years of probation, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant validly waived his right of appeal (see People v. Nunez, 220 A.D.3d 597, 197 N.Y.S.3d 61 [1st Dept. 2023], lv denied 41 N.Y.3d 1004, 213 N.Y.S.3d 222, 236 N.E.3d 1240 [2024]). The court's colloquy tracked the model colloquy endorsed by the Court of Appeals in (People v. Thomas, 34 N.Y.3d 545, 567, 122 N.Y.S.3d 226, 144 N.E.3d 970 [2019], cert denied 589 U.S. ––––, 140 S.Ct. 2634, 206 L.Ed.2d 512 [2020]). Defendant acknowledged that he signed the waiver after speaking with his attorney, and counsel acknowledged reviewing the waiver with defendant (see People v. Colon, 190 A.D.3d 563, 136 N.Y.S.3d 707 [1st Dept. 2021], lv denied 37 N.Y.3d 955, 147 N.Y.S.3d 536, 170 N.E.3d 410 [2021]). The language in the colloquy and the written waiver did not suggest that defendant waived his right to appellate counsel (see Thomas, 34 N.Y.3d at 559–560, 122 N.Y.S.3d 226, 144 N.E.3d 970).
Defendant's valid appeal waiver forecloses review of his speedy trial and Second Amendment claims, and we decline to reach them as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding to his Second Amendment challenge, defendant lacked standing by failing to apply for a license and, further, failed to establish that his conviction is unconstitutional (see e.g. People v. Khan, 225 A.D.3d 552, 206 N.Y.S.3d 74 [1st Dept. 2024], lv denied 41 N.Y.3d 1019, 214 N.Y.S.3d 322, 237 N.E.3d 1262 [2024]; People v. Jackson, 225 A.D.3d 547, 207 N.Y.S.3d 484 [1st Dept. 2024], lv denied 41 N.Y.3d 1002, 213 N.Y.S.3d 243, 236 N.E.3d 1261 [2024]; People v. Johnson, 225 A.D.3d 453, 206 N.Y.S.3d 584 [1st Dept. 2024], lv granted 42 N.Y.3d 939, 217 N.Y.S.3d 895, 242 N.E.3d 680 [2024]).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 4956
Decided: October 14, 2025
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)