Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. SKY ABSTRACT, LLC, et al., Defendants, Yoel Weisshaus, Nonparty-Appellant.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (David B. Cohen, J.), entered August 5, 2024, which denied nonparty Yoel Weisshaus's motion to vacate the default judgment against defendant Fay Farkas, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
The court providently exercised its discretion in denying Weisshaus's motion to vacate the default judgment against Farkas. The verified complaint was sufficient to establish the facts constituting the claim (see Woodson v. Mendon Leasing Corp., 100 N.Y.2d 62, 70–71, 760 N.Y.S.2d 727, 790 N.E.2d 1156 [2003]; Bigio v. Gooding, 213 A.D.3d 480, 481, 184 N.Y.S.3d 314 [1st Dept. 2023]). Moreover, the properly executed affidavit of service constituted prima facie evidence of proper service as to Farkas (see Bank of Am., N.A. v. Budhan, 171 A.D.3d 622, 622, 99 N.Y.S.3d 264 [1st Dept. 2019]). Plaintiff's failure to file the affidavit of service with the clerk of the court within 20 days of service is a “mere irregularity” rather than a jurisdictional defect and does not render the service of process a “nullity” (see Reem Contr. v. Altschul & Altschul, 117 A.D.3d 583, 584, 986 N.Y.S.2d 446 [1st Dept. 2014]; General Ins. v. Leandre, 224 A.D.3d 427, 428, 206 N.Y.S.3d 2 [1st Dept. 2024]). Service was deemed complete 10 days after plaintiff filed its motion for a default judgment with the affidavit of service (see Reem Contr. at 584, 986 N.Y.S.2d 446; General Ins. at 428, 206 N.Y.S.3d 2).
We have considered Weisshaus's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 4890
Decided: October 07, 2025
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)