Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: CARLOS WHITE, PETITIONER, v. DANIEL F. MARTUSCELLO, III, ACTING COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, RESPONDENT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County [Donald G. O'Geen, A.J.], entered February 25, 2025) to review a determination of respondent. The determination withheld petitioner's good behavior allowance.
It is hereby ORDERED that said amended petition is unanimously dismissed without costs.
Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul respondent's determination, upon the May 2024 recommendation of the Time Allowance Committee (TAC), to withhold 1 year, 8 months, and 20 days of petitioner's good behavior allowance based on his failure to complete certain treatment requirements. Even assuming, arguendo, that the amended petition raised a substantial evidence issue and thus that the proceeding was properly transferred to this Court (see generally Matter of Alvarez v Fischer, 94 AD3d 1404, 1405 [4th Dept 2012]), we conclude that the amended petition must be dismissed.
Subsequent to the determination challenged by petitioner, the TAC recommended, and respondent affirmed, that all but 5 months and 9 days of petitioner's good behavior allowance should be restored to him based on his compliance with the treatment requirements. That subsequent determination renders petitioner's challenge to the earlier determination moot (see generally Matter of Gonzalez v Department of Corr. & Community Supervision, 107 AD3d 1283, 1283 [3d Dept 2013];
Matter of Staples v Goord, 263 AD2d 943, 943-944 [3d Dept 1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 755 [1999], rearg denied 94 NY2d 900 [2000]).
Entered: October 3, 2025
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 673
Decided: October 03, 2025
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)