Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Hollis TOWNSEND, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Rena Uviller, J.), rendered May 30, 1995, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty of attempted robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of 51/212 to 11 years, unanimously affirmed.
Since defendant's motion to withdraw his plea was made on different grounds, his claim that his plea was rendered involuntary by the court's failure to inquire about the affirmative defense to robbery in the first degree is unpreserved for appellate review (People v. Rafael, 243 A.D.2d 277, 663 N.Y.S.2d 17, lv. denied 91 N.Y.2d 836, 667 N.Y.S.2d 690, 690 N.E.2d 499), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that defendant's plea was knowing and voluntary. There was nothing in defendant's allocution itself (see, People v. Negron, 222 A.D.2d 327, 635 N.Y.S.2d 615, lv. denied 88 N.Y.2d 882, 645 N.Y.S.2d 457, 668 N.E.2d 428) that would raise the possibility of an affirmative defense or otherwise cast doubt on his guilt (People v. Toxey, 86 N.Y.2d 725, 631 N.Y.S.2d 119, 655 N.E.2d 160).
Defendant's statement concerning his ownership of pictures found in the complainant's wallet was spontaneous and voluntary in that the questions and remarks were directed to the complainant and were not calculated to elicit an incriminating response from defendant (People v. Quinto, 245 A.D.2d 121, 666 N.Y.S.2d 146). Accordingly, the suppression motion was properly denied.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 14, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)