Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
ANONYMOUS, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ANONYMOUS, Defendant-Appellant.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Fern Fisher-Brandveen, J.), entered on or about June 23, 1998, which granted plaintiff's motion for an award of expert fees in the amount of $13,300 to cover the court appearances and trial preparation of Dr. Robert McMullen, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
The motion court's directive in this matrimonial action, requiring defendant to pay litigation expenses incurred by reason of plaintiff's election to call as a witness her treating medical specialist, was entirely proper. The specialist's testimony was highly relevant to plaintiff's case and plaintiff herself did not have the funds to pay the specialist for the many hours of professional time his testimony's preparation and delivery entailed. Accordingly, since the contested interim award was necessary to enable plaintiff adequately to present her case and, thus, to prevent defendant from obtaining an undue advantage in the litigation by reason of his superior economic resources, the award was not merely authorized by Domestic Relations Law § 237, but essential to the achievement of its ends as between the parties at bar (see, Wyser-Pratte v. Wyser-Pratte, 160 A.D.2d 290, 553 N.Y.S.2d 719). We note also that even if there had been some inequity in the subject interim award, defendant's proper course under the circumstances would have been to seek a speedy trial of the matrimonial action, in the aftermath of which reallocation of the contested pendente lite award could be sought based upon a complete record (see, Eisenberg v. Eisenberg, 169 A.D.2d 588, 564 N.Y.S.2d 743).
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 14, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)