Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joseph JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Antonio Brandveen, J.), rendered June 6, 1994, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third and seventh degrees and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, and sentencing him to a term of 1 to 3 years concurrent with two terms of 1 year, unanimously affirmed. The matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, New York County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50(5).
The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. Defendant's guilt was established by overwhelming evidence that he exercised dominion and control of the contraband recovered from his apartment, in his presence.
We reject defendant's claim that the court failed to properly and sufficiently address four Rosario claims. We agree with the court that two of the statements did not constitute Rosario material. In another instance, defendant received the remedy that he requested and, in the final instance, he chose not to make a sufficient record and sought no sanction.
Defendant's request for a missing witness charge, not made until both sides presented their evidence and rested, was untimely. In addition, all but one of the police officers in question had been in defendant's apartment briefly and the officer who had remained with the testifying officer could merely have been expected to provide cumulative testimony (People v. Gonzalez, 68 N.Y.2d 424, 427, 509 N.Y.S.2d 796, 502 N.E.2d 583; compare, People v. Kitching, 78 N.Y.2d 532, 577 N.Y.S.2d 231, 583 N.E.2d 944).
We have considered and rejected defendant's remaining contentions.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 12, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)