Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ramon CONCEPCION, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered June 27, 1994, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of seven counts of murder in the second degree and one count of arson in the second degree, and sentencing him to four concurrent terms of 20 years to life, consecutive to three concurrent terms of 15 years to life, consecutive to one term of 21/212 to 71/212 years, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. The totality of the circumstances supports the hearing court's determination that the defendant's statements and confession were voluntarily made and not the product of improper influence (Clewis v. Texas, 386 U.S. 707, 87 S.Ct. 1338, 18 L.Ed.2d 423; People v. Anderson, 42 N.Y.2d 35, 396 N.Y.S.2d 625, 364 N.E.2d 1318). Although defendant was at the police station for over 10 hours prior to confessing, the record supports the hearing court's determination that he had not been treated as a suspect for most of his time at the precinct. He had gone to the precinct willingly after identifying himself as the boyfriend of one of the victims, was advised of his Miranda rights, expressed a desire to assist the police in their investigation, and received sympathy from the police for his loss. He was provided with food, drinks, cigarettes, and breaks from questioning, was given an opportunity to sleep, and was never threatened or restrained. Based on all of these circumstances, we see no reason to disturb the hearing court's determination that defendant's statements were voluntarily made.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 19, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)