Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
H&P RESEARCH, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INTEGRA REALTY, INC., Defendant-Respondent, Sun Beam Enterprises, Inc., Defendant.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered April 16, 1998, which, in an action by plaintiff commercial tenant against defendant-respondent landlord for wrongful eviction, trespass, conversion and tortious interference with business relations, denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment dismissing defendant's affirmative defense of Statute of Limitations, unanimously modified, on the law, to grant the motion with respect to the causes of action for trespass, conversion and tortious interference, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
Issues of fact exist as to whether defendant fraudulently concealed its ownership interest in the subject building, and, if so, whether plaintiff was thereby induced to refrain from bringing its wrongful eviction claim against defendant in timely fashion, raised by evidence that, among other things, defendant was prohibited from filing a deed to the building by court order and that other tenants were at all relevant times making their rent checks payable to defendant. Accordingly, the motion court properly refused to estop defendant, at this juncture, from asserting the Statute of Limitations (see, Simcuski v. Saeli, 44 N.Y.2d 442, 448-449, 454, 406 N.Y.S.2d 259, 377 N.E.2d 713; General Stencils v. Chiappa, 18 N.Y.2d 125, 128-129, 272 N.Y.S.2d 337, 219 N.E.2d 169). However, the Statute of Limitations defense should have been dismissed with respect to the causes of action for conversion, trespass and tortious interference with business relations, the action having been filed within the three-year limitations period applicable to such causes of action (CPLR 214[3], [4] ), and we modify accordingly.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: February 02, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)