Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Charles CURBELO C., etc., A Dependent Child Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Wilfredo C., et al., Respondents-Appellants, The Children's Aid Society, Petitioner-Respondent.
Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Maureen A. McLeod, J.), entered on or about June 8, 2001, which, upon findings of permanent neglect, terminated appellants' parental rights to the subject child and transferred his custody and guardianship to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
There was clear and convincing evidence to support the findings that the parents permanently neglected the subject child by failing to plan for his future despite the agency's diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parental relationship (see Matter of Jamie M., 63 N.Y.2d 388, 393, 482 N.Y.S.2d 461, 472 N.E.2d 311 [1984] ). These diligent efforts were reasonable, and the agency is not “charged with a guarantee that the parent succeed in overcoming his or her predicaments” (Matter of Sheila G., 61 N.Y.2d 368, 385, 474 N.Y.S.2d 421, 462 N.E.2d 1139 [1984] ). Although the father was required to complete anger management, alcohol abuse and parenting skills programs, and the mother was required to complete drug treatment and parenting skills programs, and although the agency provided referrals and sought to follow up, neither parent successfully completed the programs within the statutorily relevant period. Furthermore, neither parent maintained contact with the child on a regular basis.
Evidence of the parents' relatively recent efforts to comply with the agency's recommendations was not sufficient to warrant a suspended judgment. The child's entire life has been in his pre-adoptive kinship foster home where he has done well and his special needs have been met (see Matter of Martin P.J.S., 2 A.D.3d 106, 767 N.Y.S.2d 607 [2003] ). Under these circumstances, we conclude that it would not serve the child's best interests to prolong foster care and that the adoptive process should proceed (see Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 N.Y.2d 136, 147-48, 481 N.Y.S.2d 26, 470 N.E.2d 824 [1984] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 18, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)