Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: MICHAEL STEVEN D. and Others, Dependent Children Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Luis D., Respondent-Appellant, The Children's Village, Petitioner-Respondent.
Orders of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Sidney Gribetz, J.), entered on or about July 27, 2001, which, after a fact-finding hearing, determined that respondent father had permanently neglected his children, terminated his parental rights to the subject children and committed them to the custody and guardianship of the Commissioner of Social Services and petitioner agency for purposes of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Petitioner established by clear and convincing evidence that the father, during the relevant statutory period, failed to present a feasible plan for the return of his five children, failed to undergo drug testing as required, failed to cooperate with the agency despite its diligent efforts to help him meet the goals of his service plan, and was inconsistent in his visitation with the children (see Social Services Law § 384-b[7] ). Furthermore, he continued to reside with the biological mother who failed to complete a drug program despite the positive toxicity findings in two of the couple's newborn children.
The court's finding that it was in the children's best interests to terminate the father's parental rights was supported by a preponderance of the evidence at the dispositional hearing (Family Court Act § 631; see Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 N.Y.2d 136, 481 N.Y.S.2d 26, 470 N.E.2d 824 [1984] ). The evidence established that the children had been in the kinship homes of their pre-adoptive foster parents for three years from the time of their placement, and that the pre-adoptive homes were found by the caseworker to be clean, loving and nurturing.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 23, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)