Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Omar Donahue WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of New York, Respondent.
Claimant filed this claim seeking damages for injuries he sustained when attacked by a fellow inmate at Auburn Correctional Facility. The claim asserts that the State of New York was negligent in failing to place him in protective custody after he was involved in an altercation with that same inmate approximately a month earlier. The Court of Claims determined that, after the prior incident, claimant executed a form voluntarily waiving protective custody and that claimant failed to establish that the State was negligent in failing to place him in involuntary protective custody. We agree.
By failing to request that the court draw an adverse inference as a result of the State's destruction of the audiotape of the disciplinary hearing concerning the prior incident, claimant failed to preserve that issue for our review (see, Matter of Miriam MM., 165 A.D.2d 934, 561 N.Y.S.2d 98). Further, claimant failed to establish that the State deliberately destroyed the audiotape or that the audiotape was destroyed in violation of the State's policy regarding the retention of audiotapes of disciplinary proceedings (cf., Livingston v. State of New York [Appeal No. 4], 254 A.D.2d 694, 677 N.Y.S.2d 856 [decided herewith] ).
The court did not abuse its discretion in admitting into evidence a fight investigation report concerning the prior incident. Claimant failed to establish that the State willfully failed to produce the report for pretrial discovery or that the State had been ordered to produce the report (see, CPLR 3126[2] ).
There is no merit to the contention that claimant was treated unfairly because he was directed to provide the State with a list of his witnesses prior to trial and the State was not so directed. The trial was held at Auburn Correctional Facility, a maximum security prison. The direction that claimant provide a list of witnesses was reasonably necessary for purposes of institutional safety and security.
Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 02, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)