Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Maurice R. GREENBERG, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.), all seven of which were entered November 14, 2008, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendants' motions for a stay of proceedings, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
The motion court properly declined to grant a stay of proceedings pending resolution of a related action in federal court (see CPLR 2201; 952 Assoc., LLC v. Palmer, 52 A.D.3d 236, 236-237, 859 N.Y.S.2d 138 [2008]; Mt. McKinley Ins. Co. v. Corning Inc., 33 A.D.3d 51, 58-59, 818 N.Y.S.2d 73 [2006] ). Defendants are former executives and/or directors of plaintiff American International Group, Inc. (AIG), the defendant in the federal action; they are current and/or former directors and/or voting shareholders of the plaintiff in the federal action, Starr International Co., Inc. (SICO). In the federal action, AIG asserted counterclaims against SICO arising out of SICO's alleged obligations to AIG in connection with certain stock. AIG's allegations herein arise out of defendants' alleged independent fiduciary duties to AIG by virtue of their express pledges to preserve the value of said stock. A finding as to SICO's duty to AIG would not affect defendants' potential liability as independent fiduciaries of AIG and would not dispose of or significantly limit the issues involved in this action or pose a risk of inconsistent rulings (see Belopolsky v. Renew Data Corp., 41 A.D.3d 322, 837 N.Y.S.2d 154 [2007]; Asher v. Abbott Labs., 307 A.D.2d 211, 763 N.Y.S.2d 555 [2003] ).
We have considered defendants' remaining arguments and find them unavailing.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 12, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)