Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Cai Gui LI, Petitioner, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Respondents.
Determination of the Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings (OATH), dated December 6, 2019, which, after a hearing, found that petitioner had allowed a vehicle to be operated for hire without a permit in violation of Administrative Code of the City of New York § 19–506(b)(1), and imposed a fine of $2,000, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Arlene P. Bluth, J.], entered on or about April 17, 2024), unanimously dismissed, without costs.
OATH's determination, as affirmed by its Appeals Unit, is supported by substantial evidence, including the sworn summons and the testimony given by two officers from the New York Taxi and Limousine Commission (see Matter of Umeokafor v. City of New York, 199 A.D.3d 435, 436, 153 N.Y.S.3d 859 [1st Dept. 2021]). One officer testified that he was approached by two men at LaGuardia Airport who offered to arrange a ride to Flushing for a fare and was told to look for a certain license plate number. Petitioner arrived shortly thereafter in a vehicle bearing that license plate number and, when asked if he was a taxi, nodded “yes.” Though petitioner testified that the officer never asked him if he was operating a taxi, the Hearing Officer's decision to credit the officer's testimony over petitioner's is largely unreviewable by this Court (see Matter of Faison v. New York City Taxi & Limousine Commn., 176 A.D.3d 416, 416, 107 N.Y.S.3d 662 [1st Dept. 2019], citing Matter of Berenhaus v. Ward, 70 N.Y.2d 436, 443, 522 N.Y.S.2d 478, 517 N.E.2d 193 [1987]). In any event, “an agency's determination that finds support in the record should not be disturbed even where the evidence is conflicting, room for choice exists and this Court may have reached a different conclusion” (see Matter of Berenhaus, 70 N.Y.2d at 444, 522 N.Y.S.2d 478, 517 N.E.2d 193).
We have considered petitioner's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 4402
Decided: May 22, 2025
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)