Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Timothy G. SCHMITZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALPHA HOUSE, INC., Defendant-Respondent, et al., Defendant.
Plaintiff commenced this action seeking damages for injuries he sustained when he fell in the shower at Alpha House, Inc. (defendant), the drug-treatment facility in which he was a resident. We agree with plaintiff that Supreme Court erred in granting the motion of defendant for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint against it (see generally Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 562, 427 N.Y.S.2d 595, 404 N.E.2d 718). In support of its motion, defendant merely contended that plaintiff slipped as a result of soap suds from his body. “As the proponent of the motion, [however,] defendant had the initial burden of establishing that it did not create the dangerous condition that caused plaintiff to fall and did not have actual or constructive notice thereof” (Quinn v. Holiday Health & Fitness Ctrs. of N.Y., 15 A.D.3d 857, 857, 789 N.Y.S.2d 782). Defendant failed to meet its initial burden of establishing that it did not have notice of the slippery condition complained of by plaintiff and, in any event, we conclude that plaintiff raised an issue of fact to defeat defendant's motion. In opposing the motion, plaintiff submitted an affidavit in which he asserted that, several times prior to his fall, he had complained to defendant that the surface of the tub was slippery and that defendant nevertheless failed to install a nonslip mat in the tub to address the slippery condition. Thus, we conclude that plaintiff thereby raised an issue of fact whether defendant had notice of the allegedly defective condition and, if so, whether defendant took steps to correct the condition in a timely manner (cf. id.; see generally Gordon v. American Museum of Natural History, 67 N.Y.2d 836, 501 N.Y.S.2d 646, 492 N.E.2d 774).
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion is denied and the amended complaint is reinstated.
MEMORANDUM:
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 03, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)