Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Kevin WILLIAMS, Defendant–Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Marsha D. Michael, J.), rendered June 30, 2021, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of three years, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. The testifying officer observed defendant urinating on a public sidewalk, in violation of the Administrative Code of the City of New York (see Administrative Code § 16–118[6]). This conduct provided the police with a basis to approach defendant to issue a summons or, in their discretion, to effectuate his arrest (see People v. Miranda, 19 N.Y.3d 912, 913 n *, 950 N.Y.S.2d 615, 974 N.E.2d 661 [2012]; see also People v. McCorkle, 111 A.D.3d 557, 558, 977 N.Y.S.2d 2 [1st Dept. 2013], lv denied 24 N.Y.3d 963, 996 N.Y.S.2d 222, 20 N.E.3d 1002 [2014]). When the officers observed a knife in defendant's waistband as they approached him, they were authorized to frisk him as a “protective measure” (see People v. Terrance, 101 A.D.3d 624, 625, 957 N.Y.S.2d 316 [1st Dept. 2012], lv denied 20 N.Y.3d 1065, 962 N.Y.S.2d 616, 985 N.E.2d 926 [2013]). Accordingly, the gun discovered during that frisk was lawfully recovered.
Defendant's challenge to his adjudication as a second felony offender on the ground “that his out-of-state conviction was not the equivalent of a New York felony is unpreserved because there was neither a timely objection before the sentencing court nor was the issue raised by a CPL 440.20 motion” (People v. Brown, 135 A.D.3d 605, 606, 22 N.Y.S.3d 870 [1st Dept. 2016], lv denied 27 N.Y.3d 993, 38 N.Y.S.3d 103, 59 N.E.3d 1215 [2016]; see People v. Jurgins, 26 N.Y.3d 607, 612, 26 N.Y.S.3d 495, 46 N.E.3d 1048 [2015]), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Defendant's ineffective assistance of counsel claim “is unreviewable on direct appeal because the record does not explain counsel's reasons for declining to challenge the predicate conviction” (People v. Rincon, 62 A.D.3d 574, 575, 879 N.Y.S.2d 424 [1st Dept. 2009], lv denied 13 N.Y.3d 748, 886 N.Y.S.2d 102, 914 N.E.2d 1020 [2009]).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 4136
Decided: April 17, 2025
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)