Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Patricia A. CARUANA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OSWEGO COUNTY BOARD OF COOPERATIVE EDUCATION SERVICES and James Loomis, Defendants-Respondents.
Plaintiff commenced this negligence action seeking damages for injuries she sustained when the left front wheel came off her car as she drove along the highway. The day before the accident, a student under the supervision of defendant James Loomis at a school operated by defendant Oswego County Board of Cooperative Education Services had changed the tires on plaintiff's car. Defendants moved for summary judgment on the ground, inter alia, that plaintiff did not plead, and could not prove, that she sustained a serious injury (see Insurance Law § 5102[d] ) as assertedly required by Insurance Law § 5104(a), and plaintiff cross-moved, inter alia, for an order granting partial summary judgment determining that she need not plead or prove that she sustained a serious injury. By its order on appeal, Supreme Court determined, inter alia, that the action is “subject to” the no-fault insurance law, and thus implicitly determined that plaintiff is required to meet the serious injury threshold (see § 5104[a] ). We conclude that the court should have granted that part of plaintiff's cross motion for partial summary judgment determining that plaintiff need not plead or prove that she sustained a serious injury.
Pursuant to Insurance Law § 5104(a), in an action by one “covered person” against another “covered person,” the plaintiff cannot recover for noneconomic injury unless he or she has sustained a “serious injury” as defined in section 5102(d) of the Insurance Law. A “covered person” is defined as a “pedestrian injured through the use or operation of, or any owner, operator or occupant of, a motor vehicle ․; or any other person entitled to first party benefits” (§ 5102[j] ). Here, plaintiff is a covered person within the meaning of section 5102(j), but defendants and their student are not (see generally Hill v. Metropolitan Suburban Bus Auth., 157 A.D.2d 93, 97, 555 N.Y.S.2d 803; Lang v. City of New York, 98 A.D.2d 792, 469 N.Y.S.2d 971).
It is hereby ORDERED that the order insofar as appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law with costs, that part of the cross motion for partial summary judgment determining that plaintiff need not plead or prove that she sustained a serious injury is granted and the third ordering paragraph is vacated.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: February 03, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)