Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
TRI-LAND PROPERTIES, INC., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. 115 WEST 28TH STREET CORP., et al., Defendants-Appellants, Neil B. Hirschfeld, Defendant.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.), entered December 11, 1998, and judgment entered thereon on December 17, 1998, confirming the referee's report of sale, determining the fair and reasonable market value of the premises as of December 11, 1997, and awarding a deficiency judgment in the sum of $858,395.36, in this mortgage foreclosure action brought against defendants-appellants 115 West 28th Street Corp., as mortgagor, and New York Foundation for Senior Citizens Guardian Services, Inc. as Guardian for Eleanor Dube, as guarantor, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
It is clear that the guaranty executed by Dube on the promissory note, which defined holders as, inter alia, any transferees, was not a special guarantee, since it permitted any holder to bring suit against the guarantor. Therefore, Dube's intended obligations have not been enlarged (cf., Fehr Bros., Inc. v. Scheinman, 121 A.D.2d 13, 15-16, 509 N.Y.S.2d 304).
Furthermore, in view of overwhelming support in the appraisal for a market value of $680,000 on the date of auction, the conclusory documents submitted by defendants purporting to establish a higher value did not create a question of fact requiring a hearing (see, Golden City Commercial Bank v. Hawk Props. Corp., 240 A.D.2d 218, 658 N.Y.S.2d 301). Finally, under the circumstances, the deficiency judgment was properly entered without resolution of the previously severed counterclaims.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 17, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)