Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Deochand GOPEE, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. CVS ALBANY L.L.C., et al., Defendants–Respondents.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Elizabeth A. Taylor, J.), entered on or about April 16, 2024, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on liability, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court properly denied plaintiff's motion, as there were triable issues of fact concerning whether the sprinkler system operated and maintained by defendants caused the wet condition of the sidewalk (see generally Simmons v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 84 N.Y.2d 972, 622 N.Y.S.2d 496, 646 N.E.2d 798 [1994]). Defendant lessee presented an invoice by a servicing company indicating that the sprinklers were turned off in October 2019, before plaintiff's accident on December 21, 2019. In opposition, plaintiff presented a video taken by his investigator of the sprinklers in operation, but the video was filmed in September 2020, nine months after the accident and before the sprinklers were typically turned off for the winter, according to a member of defendant owner. The climate data also was inconclusive in that it showed freezing rain, rain, sleet, snow showers, and snow flurries from December 16, 2019 to December 19, 2019, with temperatures both above and below freezing at various times. Although plaintiff's expert opined that the conditions on the day before the accident were favorable for melting and evaporation, some areas may have remained wet. Accordingly, plaintiff did not establish as a matter of law that the wet condition on the sidewalk was caused by defendants' negligence (see Raghu v. New York City Hous. Auth., 72 A.D.3d 480, 482, 897 N.Y.S.2d 436 [1st Dept. 2010]).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 3842
Decided: March 06, 2025
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)