Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: 305 RIVERSIDE CORP., Petitioner-Respondent, v. NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY RENEWAL, Respondent-Appellant.
Order and Judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene P. Bluth, J.), entered on or about April 20, 2023, granting the petition to vacate a December 20, 2022 order of respondent New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR), which denied petitioner's two petitions for administrative review and dismissed petitioner's petitions for High Income Rent Deregulation for apartment 12D in petitioner's building, ordering that the matter be remanded to DHCR to issue a decision on the merits of petitioner's deregulation applications, and awarding petitioner costs and disbursements, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 dismissed.
DHCR rationally concluded that Part D of the Housing Stability and Tenant Protection Act of 2019 (HSTPA) stripped it of its authority to issue a deregulation order for the subject apartment based on the prior high income deregulation provisions (see Matter of 160 E. 84th St. Assoc. LLC v. New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, ––– N.Y.3d ––––, ––– N.Y.S.3d ––––, ––– N.E.3d ––––, 2024 N.Y. Slip Op. 06377 [2024]). Additionally, it is undisputed that the owner renewed the tenant's lease in October 2018, which did not expire until after the June 14, 2019 enactment of the HSTPA (id. ––– N.Y.3d at –––– – ––––, ––– N.Y.S.3d ––––, ––– N.E.3d ––––, at *1–2).
While DHCR had a significant delay in processing petitioner's applications, petitioner failed to establish that the delay was caused by DHCR's negligence or willfulness (see Matter of 160 E. 84th St. Assoc. LLC v. New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 209 A.D.3d 517, 517–518, 175 N.Y.S.3d 206 [1st Dept. 2022], affd ––– N.Y.3d ––––, , ––– N.Y.S.3d ––––, ––– N.E.3d ––––, 2024 N.Y. Slip Op. 06377 [2024]; Matter of McCarthy v. New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 290 A.D.2d 313, 314, 736 N.Y.S.2d 353 [1st Dept. 2002]; Matter of Evans v. New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 284 A.D.2d 193, 193, 726 N.Y.S.2d 262 [1st Dept. 2001]).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 1180
Decided: February 25, 2025
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)