Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Rosa CASIANO et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants v. R.G. ORTIZ FUNERAL HOME INC., Defendant-Respondent, Delta Air Lines, Inc., Defendant.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mary Ann Brigantti, J.), entered on or about June 20, 2024, which denied plaintiffs' motion for a default judgment against defendant R.G. Ortiz Funeral Home Inc., unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiffs did not establish that R.G. Ortiz defaulted before January 16, 2024, the date plaintiffs filed their motion. Although R.G. Ortiz stipulated to a December 31, 2023 due date for its answer, defendant Delta Air Lines, Inc. removed the action to federal court three days before that deadline, on December 28, 2023. R.G. Ortiz then had until January 4, 2024 to file an answer in federal court (see Fed Rules Civ Pro rule 81[c][2][C]). However, on that date, the federal court remanded the action to state court. Supreme Court was not entitled to resume proceedings until the date on which the federal court clerk mailed a certified copy of the remand order to the clerk of Supreme Court (28 USC § 1447[c]), and thus R.G. Ortiz's answer could not have been due before that date. The record does not indicate when this mailing occurred; however, the record demonstrates that the clerk of Supreme Court did not enter the remand order until January 16, 2024. Because R.G. Ortiz had until the end of that day to file its answer, plaintiffs' papers, filed that day, were filed prematurely and did not establish that R.G. Ortiz defaulted.
We have considered plaintiffs' remaining contentions and find them unavailing.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 3608
Decided: January 30, 2025
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)