Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Andy ARAGON, Defendant–Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Curtis J. Farber, J., at suppression hearing; Ann Scherzer, J., at trial and sentencing), rendered September 8, 2020, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth and seventh degrees and unlawful possession of marijuana, and sentencing him, as a second felony drug offender previously convicted of a violent felony offense, to an aggregate term of 31/212 years, unanimously reversed, on the law, the motion to suppress granted, and the indictment dismissed.
Defendant was entitled to suppression of the cocaine and money recovered in a search of his person, which occurred after officers pulled over the minivan in which he was a passenger for two traffic violations and detected a strong odor of marijuana as they approached the van. An officer saw loose marijuana on defendant's lap, asked him to step out of the car, and immediately frisked him, finding a small plastic bag in defendant's pocket and a significantly larger one inside the top of his underwear. The drugs were not recovered in a valid search pursuant to a lawful arrest because the record fails to show that the officer had any intention of arresting defendant before recovering the cocaine (see People v. Reid, 24 N.Y.3d 615, 619, 2 N.Y.S.3d 409, 26 N.E.3d 237 [2014]). Since defendant's marijuana conviction has already been vacated and count dismissed (see CPL 160.50[3][k][iii], [5][a]), all of the drugs and money recovered should be suppressed, and the indictment dismissed.
In view of the foregoing, we find it unnecessary to address defendant's remaining arguments for affirmative relief.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 3428
Decided: January 07, 2025
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)