Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Eleanor L. SIMMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. APA TRUCK LEASING CORPORATION, et al., Defendants-Respondents.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Jerry L. Crispino, J.), entered August 5, 2003, which granted defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
In opposition to defendants' prima facie showing of no “serious injury” (Insurance Law § 5102[d] ), plaintiff submitted the report of his examining physician which, while denominated an affirmation, is neither affirmed nor sworn to (CPLR 2106; Grasso v. Angerami, 79 N.Y.2d 813, 580 N.Y.S.2d 178, 588 N.E.2d 76 [1991]; Charlton v. Almaraz, 278 A.D.2d 145, 718 N.Y.S.2d 52 [2000] ). Thus, the court properly refused to consider the unsworn report. Plaintiff's attempt to submit a corrected affirmation for the first time on appeal to this Court is improper and we decline to consider it. In any event, the measurements of loss of range of motion described therein are not shown to be causally connected to the accident in which plaintiff allegedly sustained the loss (Chrisomalides v. Ekow, 291 A.D.2d 202, 736 N.Y.S.2d 862 [2002] ), nor does the affirmation address defendants' radiologist's findings attributing plaintiff's spinal condition to a preexisting degenerative condition (Shinn v. Catanzaro, 1 A.D.3d 195, 767 N.Y.S.2d 88 [2003] ), or how that condition may have impacted on his diagnosis (Shaw v. Looking Glass Assoc., 8 A.D.3d 100, 779 N.Y.S.2d 7 [2004] ). Additional diagnostic statements in plaintiff's physician's report were conclusory and tailored to meet statutory requirements (Hernandez v. Lopez, 9 A.D.3d 300, 780 N.Y.S.2d 583 [2004] ). Plaintiff's radiologist's report is also insufficient since the mere existence of a herniated disc does not per se constitute serious injury (Noble v. Ackerman, 252 A.D.2d 392, 394, 675 N.Y.S.2d 86 [1998] ), and plaintiff failed to offer any objective evidence, as is required, of the extent or degree of her alleged physical limitations and their duration, resulting from the disc injury (Arjona v. Calcano, 7 A.D.3d 279, 776 N.Y.S.2d 49 [2004] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 04, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)