Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Charles HENDRIX, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Gregory Carro, J.), rendered January 14, 2003, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of 7 years, unanimously affirmed.
Since defendant's ineffective assistance of counsel claim turns on matters that are not reflected in the record, including his communications with his trial counsel and counsel's trial preparation and strategy, it would require a further record to be developed by way of a CPL 440.10 motion (see People v. Love, 57 N.Y.2d 998, 457 N.Y.S.2d 238, 443 N.E.2d 486). To the extent the existing record permits review, it establishes that defendant received effective assistance (see People v. Benevento, 91 N.Y.2d 708, 713-714, 674 N.Y.S.2d 629, 697 N.E.2d 584; see also Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674). Counsel's alleged failure to make a timely investigation of a collateral matter involving defendant's family background could not have deprived defendant of a fair trial (see People v. Hobot, 84 N.Y.2d 1021, 1024, 622 N.Y.S.2d 675, 646 N.E.2d 1102).
The court's justification charge was appropriate in light of the trial evidence, which established that defendant either used deadly physical force or no force at all (see People v. Mickens, 219 A.D.2d 543, 631 N.Y.S.2d 687, lv. denied 87 N.Y.2d 904, 641 N.Y.S.2d 234, 663 N.E.2d 1264).
Defendant's other challenges to the court's charge and his challenge to the People's summation are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 10, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)