Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Steven AKINS, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. D.K. INTERIORS, LTD., et al., Defendants, Akam Associates, Defendant-Appellant.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Yvonne Gonzalez, J.), entered October 23, 2007, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendant Akam Associates' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.
The record establishes that while plaintiff was employed as a doorman by defendant 230 Tenants Corporation Co-Op and was supervised by and reported to the building's superintendent, also an employee of 230 Tenants, the superintendent took his instructions from Akam's employee, the building's property manager. Moreover, the contract between 230 Tenants and Akam, the managing agent, gave Akam control of the building employees, which was exercised by Akam's property manager, who managed, supervised and disciplined staff members, monitored their work schedules, dress and job performance, inspected the premises and supervised work being performed. The property manager generated documentation for plaintiff's successful workers' compensation claim arising from the subject accident based on plaintiff's general employment by 230 Tenants. These facts show prima facie that Akam controlled the daily operation of the building and the manner and details of plaintiff's work and therefore that Akam was plaintiff's special employer (see Ayala v. Mutual Hous. Assn., Inc., 33 A.D.3d 343, 822 N.Y.S.2d 262 [2006]; Ramirez v. Miller, 41 A.D.3d 298, 839 N.Y.S.2d 461 [2007], lv. denied 12 N.Y.3d 705, 879 N.Y.S.2d 51, 906 N.E.2d 1085 [2009] ). This prima facie showing is not rebutted by the fact that the board of directors of 230 Tenants was involved in the management of the building or that 230 Tenants retained the ultimate power to hire and fire staff (see Thompson v. Grumman Aerospace Corp., 78 N.Y.2d 553, 578 N.Y.S.2d 106, 585 N.E.2d 355 [1991]; Villanueva v. Southeast Grand St. Guild Hous. Dev. Fund Co., Inc., 37 A.D.3d 155, 829 N.Y.S.2d 459 [2007] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 24, 2009
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)