Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Francisco ALSINA, Defendant–Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles H. Solomon, J.), rendered June 15, 2017, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree, attempted murder in the second degree, assault in the first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (two counts), and sentencing him to an aggregate term of 35 years to life, unanimously affirmed.
The verdict rejecting defendant's justification defense was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v. Danielson, 9 N.Y.3d 342, 348–349, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1 [2007]). There is no basis to disturb the jury's credibility determinations, including its rejection of defendant's testimony that he shot the victims when they attempted to rob him at knifepoint during a drug transaction. The jury reasonably credited the testimony of the surviving victim that defendant shot him and the decedent after a dispute over drug-dealing territory, which was corroborated by other evidence, including multiple eyewitness accounts of what had occurred and surveillance video footage.
Defendant did not preserve his contention that he was deprived of due process and a fair trial by the prosecutor's failure to correct the victim's misstatements regarding whether any promises were made in exchange for his testimony, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we reject it on the merits. The prosecutor conveyed to the jury upon further examination of the victim, and disclosed on summation, that a promise had been made (see People v. Novoa, 70 N.Y.2d 490, 496–497, 522 N.Y.S.2d 504, 517 N.E.2d 219 [1987]).
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 2693
Decided: October 03, 2024
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)