Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Bruce FELDMAN, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MAFFUCCI STORAGE CORP., et al., Defendants-Respondents.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold B. Beeler, J.), entered December 27, 2004, which granted the motion of defendant Bekins Van Lines Co. for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, and granted the motion of defendant Maffucci Storage Corp. for partial summary judgment, limiting its liability to $20,000, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiffs contracted with defendant Maffucci Storage to transport certain household property to a Maffucci warehouse. Several months later, the property was destroyed in a fire at the warehouse. A warehouse may limit its liability for damage to stored goods, even if the damage is attributable to warehouse negligence, so long as the bailor is afforded an opportunity to raise the cap on the bailee's liability by paying a higher storage fee (UCC 7-204 [2]; I.C.C. Metals, Inc. v. Mun. Warehouse Co., 50 N.Y.2d 657, 663, 431 N.Y.S.2d 372, 409 N.E.2d 849 [1980]; Lubell v. Samson Moving & Stor., Inc., 290 A.D.2d 343, 737 N.Y.S.2d 24 [2002]; Meyer v. Certified Moving & Stor. Co., Inc., 162 A.D.2d 109, 112, 556 N.Y.S.2d 63 [1990] ). Here, the Bill of Lading signed by plaintiff Bruce Feldman and the subsequently issued invoice established that plaintiffs elected to purchase insurance in the amount of $20,000 to cover the bailed goods during both their transport and storage by Maffucci. The corresponding limitation imposed upon Maffucci's liability was, accordingly, proper.
Also proper was the dismissal of the complaint against defendant Bekins Van Lines. Bekins made a prima facie showing that Maffucci did not act as its agent in its dealings with plaintiffs, and plaintiffs did not in response adduce evidence to the contrary sufficient to raise a triable issue (cf. Paget v. Budget Rent A Car Corp., 160 A.D.2d 533, 554 N.Y.S.2d 1004 [1990]; Fogel v. Hertz Intl., Ltd., 141 A.D.2d 375, 529 N.Y.S.2d 484 [1988] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 03, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)