PEOPLE v. HOVING (2024)

Judgment of conviction (Kate Paek, J.), rendered February 16, 2018, affirmed.

The verdict was supported by legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court's credibility determinations and its assessment of a video recording of the incident. The evidence established that defendant intentionally attempted to damage the property of another (see Penal Law §§ 110.00/145.00) by rubbing transparent glue on the keypad buttons of the intercom system in his apartment building, causing it to stop working and resulting in approximately $3,127 in damages.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.

Per Curiam.

All concur.