Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Virgil HATCHER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF MANAGERS OF the 420 WEST 23RD STREET CONDOMINIUM, et al., Respondents-Respondents, Department of Housing Preservation and Development of the City of New York, Respondent.
Order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department, entered June 19, 2006, which reversed a judgment of the Housing Court, New York County (Kevin C. McClanahan, J.), entered on or about June 24, 2004, directing the respondent condominium to employ a certified resident janitor, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Appellate Term properly found that the obligations of respondent condominium under Housing Maintenance Code (Administrative Code of the City of N.Y.) §§ 27-2053 and 2054 were met by its provision of janitorial services. Nothing in the relevant statutes supports petitioner's contention that they must be construed as requiring that janitorial services be provided by the resident owner itself, and we decline to rewrite the governing statutes under the guise of interpretation.
The condominium properly complied with Housing Maintenance Code §§ 27-2055 and 2054 by certifying that its janitor was competent to perform the required janitorial services and capable of operating the furnace, boiler and other machinery that provides central heat and hot water, and that he did not service more than 65 units. We reject petitioner's claim that the additional provision of services by a back-up janitor who serviced more than 65 units impaired this compliance (see Hatcher v. Bd. of Managers, 12 Misc.3d 78 at 80, 819 N.Y.S.2d 374 [2006] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 26, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)