Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: JOCELYN S. and Others, Dependent Children Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Michelle S., Respondent-Appellant, Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner-Respondent.
Orders of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Jody Adams, J.), entered on or about May 19, 2003, which, after a fact-finding hearing, adjudged respondent mother to have neglected the children and placed them in the care of their maternal grandmother, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Contrary to respondent's contentions, the hearing court's neglect determination was based on more than positive toxicology. Respondent reportedly admitted to a caseworker that she had been using both marijuana and cocaine since December 1999. In addition to testimony of respondent's use of narcotics for years, petitioner agency established that respondent did not receive any prenatal care during her pregnancy with Jonathan R. She admitted having abused drugs on at least two occasions while pregnant, including the date of delivery. She and the child tested positive for both marijuana and cocaine. Thereafter, respondent was enrolled in a drug treatment program at the insistence of the investigating caseworker. Respondent attended these classes only sporadically, notwithstanding the consequences of nonattendance. She eventually stopped attending altogether.
Relying on the assessment of the caseworker as to respondent's prior drug abuse (see Matter of Irene O., 38 N.Y.2d 776, 777, 381 N.Y.S.2d 865, 345 N.E.2d 337 [1975] ), and taking into account the content of the hospital charts, respondent's admitted drug abuse during pregnancy and her failure to comply with her drug treatment program, the court found a preponderance of evidence supporting a finding of neglect (see Family Court Act § 1012; Matter of Theresa J., 158 A.D.2d 364, 551 N.Y.S.2d 219 [1990] ), as well as derivative neglect of the other children (Matter of Hunter YY., 18 A.D.3d 899, 795 N.Y.S.2d 116 [2005] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 20, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)