Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. WYATT S. PENFOLD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his guilty plea of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05 [3]), defendant contends that he was deprived of effective assistance of counsel because his attorney failed to file any motions, failed to request a hearing pursuant to People v Outley (80 NY2d 702 [1993]), and failed to move to withdraw his plea when it became apparent that County Court would impose an enhanced sentence. We reject defendant's contention. An attorney is not ineffective for failing to file motions that have “ ‘little or no chance of success’ ” (People v Caban, 5 NY3d 143, 152 [2005]; see People v Zona, 225 AD3d 1296, 1297-1298 [4th Dept 2024]), and defendant has not identified any motions that he believes would have been meritorious if filed on his behalf. With respect to defendant's remaining complaints about defense counsel's performance, we note that defendant stated on the record at sentencing that he did not wish to have an Outley hearing, which the court offered to conduct, and defense counsel stated, without contradiction by defendant, that defendant did not wish to withdraw his plea. Considering that defense counsel negotiated a seemingly favorable plea agreement, which involved the dismissal of two unrelated felony charges, we conclude, after viewing the evidence, the law and the circumstances of this case in totality and as of the time of the representation, that defendant was afforded meaningful representation (see generally People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]).
Finally, defendant's challenge to the severity of his enhanced sentence is precluded by his valid waiver of the right to appeal (see People v May, 169 AD3d 1365, 1365 [4th Dept 2019]; see generally People v Garcia, 155 AD3d 1570, 1571 [4th Dept 2017], lv denied 31 NY3d 983 [2018]).
Entered: July 26, 2024
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 485
Decided: July 26, 2024
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)