Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: CAYUGA NATION, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. CARLIN SENECA-JOHN, AND CARLIN SENECA-JOHN, DOING BUSINESS AS GRAMMA APPROVED SOVEREIGN TRADES, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: In appeal No. 1, petitioner appeals from an order that denied its CPLR article 4 petition seeking recognition of a Cayuga Nation Civil Court (Nation Court) judgment against respondents, Carlin Seneca-John and Carlin Seneca-John, doing business as Gramma Approved Sovereign Trades. In appeal No. 2, petitioner appeals from an order that, in effect, granted petitioner's motion for leave to renew and reargue with respect to the order in appeal No. 1 and, upon renewal and reargument, adhered to the prior determination.
At the outset, we note that, in deciding petitioner's motion for leave to renew and reargue, Supreme Court considered and rejected the substantive arguments raised by petitioner. Therefore, although the order in appeal No. 2 does not state as much, it is clear to this Court that the court, in effect, granted petitioner's motion insofar as it sought leave to renew and reargue and, upon renewal and reargument, adhered to its original determination. We therefore dismiss the appeal from the order in appeal No. 1 (see Manes v State of New York, 182 AD3d 1012, 1013 [4th Dept 2020], lv denied 35 NY3d 913 [2020]; Loafin’ Tree Rest. v Pardi [appeal No. 1], 162 AD2d 985, 985 [4th Dept 1990]).
Addressing petitioner's contentions in appeal No. 2, we conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in adhering to its determination to deny the petition seeking recognition of the Nation Court judgment (see generally Unkechaug Indian Nation v Treadwell, 192 AD3d 729, 733 [2d Dept 2021]).
Entered: July 3, 2024
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 267
Decided: July 03, 2024
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)