Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: SARAH-BETH H., A Dependent Child Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Sandra H., Respondent-Appellant, Graham-Windham Services to Families and Children, Petitioner-Respondent.
Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Jody Adams, J.), entered on or about December 13, 2005, upon a fact-finding determination of mental illness, terminating respondent's parental rights to the subject child and committing the child's guardianship and custody to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for purposes of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The finding of mental illness within the meaning of Social Services Law § 384-b(4)(c) and 6(a) is supported by clear and convincing evidence, including respondent's medical records and the testimony of the court-appointed psychiatrist (see Matter of Antonio Tyrone B., 298 A.D.2d 128, 747 N.Y.S.2d 232 [2002] ). Family Court properly denied respondent's request for an adjournment when her witnesses failed to appear, where the proceeding had been previously adjourned when respondent's witnesses failed to appear, and respondent failed to comply with a court order directing her to produce medical records bearing upon her witnesses' anticipated testimony (see Matter of Steven B., 6 N.Y.3d 888, 817 N.Y.S.2d 599, 850 N.E.2d 646 [2006] ). There is no statutory authorization for a suspended judgment upon a finding of mental illness (see Matter of Ernesto Thomas A., 5 A.D.3d 380, 381, 772 N.Y.S.2d 708 [2004] ). In any event, the record shows that respondent's condition is unlikely to improve in the foreseeable future and causes the child stress, and that the child has bonded with her foster mother with whom she had lived for nearly all of her life.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 09, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)