Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. David EHINMIAKHENA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment of conviction (Joanne B. Watters, J., on suppression motion; Sheryl L. Parker, J.H.O., at plea and sentencing), rendered December 9, 2016, affirmed.
The court properly denied, without a hearing, defendant's motion to suppress. Regardless of the legality of the police stop of defendant's vehicle, the defendant's identity, his Department of Motor Vehicle records and the officers’ post-stop observations of defendant were not suppressible fruits of unlawful police conduct (see People v Tolentino, 14 NY3d 382, 384-385 [2010], cert dismissed 563 US 123 [2011]; People v Maldonado, 221 AD3d 546, 547 [2023]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
Per Curiam.
All concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 570018 /17
Decided: May 21, 2024
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York,
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)