Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: PEOPLE of the State of New York ON RELATION OF Paul RAMOS, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, Respondent.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that said proceeding is unanimously dismissed without costs.
Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul the determination of the Administrative Law Judge, following a parole revocation hearing, revoking his release to parole supervision and ordering him to serve a 36-month time assessment. Pursuant to CPLR 7804 (g), the proceeding was transferred to this Court in September 2023.
In November 2023, petitioner was convicted upon a guilty plea of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.16 [1]) and was sentenced to a determinate term of imprisonment of six years and 11/212 years of postrelease supervision, to run concurrently with his prior sentence.
Notably, the petition does not challenge the determination that petitioner violated his parole conditions by failing to abide by his curfew on March 10, 2022. Rather, petitioner challenges the parole violations relating to his possession of drug paraphernalia and possession of a firearm, and he challenges the alleged excessiveness of the time assessment. Thus, an order granting the petition would leave in place both the sustained charge for the curfew violation and the delinquency date of March 10, 2022, which was established in connection with the curfew violation. As a result, the calculation of petitioner's remaining term of postrelease supervision would be unaffected by a ruling in favor of petitioner in this proceeding.
We conclude that because petitioner has identified no other “readily ascertainable and legally significant enduring consequence[ ]” of the parole revocation determination, petitioner's challenge to that determination was rendered moot upon his November 2023 conviction, and the proceeding must be dismissed (Matter of Veronica P. v. Radcliff A., 24 N.Y.3d 668, 671, 3 N.Y.S.3d 288, 26 N.E.3d 1143 [2015]; see generally People ex rel. Daniels v. Beaver, 303 A.D.2d 1025, 1025, 757 N.Y.S.2d 195 [4th Dept. 2003]).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 195
Decided: May 03, 2024
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)