Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Khalid ALGHAFLY et al., Plaintiffs–Respondents, v. Fadi EWIESS also known as Fadi Awise, Defendant–Appellant.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Andrea Masley, J.), entered June 29, 2023, which denied defendant's CPLR 5015 motion to vacate the default judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Defendant supported his motion to vacate the default judgment under CPLR 5015(a)(4) only by an affidavit by his counsel containing conclusory allegations not based on personal knowledge. He failed to submit his own affidavit by defendant averring that he never transacted business in New York (see cf. Liu Yu v. Ma, 145 AD3d 577, 577 [1st Dept 2016]). Accordingly, defendant did not adequately raise the issue that the court lacked personal jurisdiction over him pursuant to CPLR 302(a)(1) Furthermore, based on the record, plaintiff at least “demonstrated a basis for jurisdiction” (see SOS Capital v. Recycling Paper Partners of PA, LLC, 220 AD3d 25, 38 [1st Dept 2023]) and the motion to vacate on this ground was properly denied.
Similarly, the court also correctly declined to grant the motion to vacate his default based on the CPLR 5015(a)(1). Defendant could not demonstrate either a reasonable excuse for his default or a meritorious defense to the action because “he submitted his motion without an affidavit by someone with personal knowledge of the pertinent facts, i.e., himself,” and the affirmation by his counsel, who lacked personal knowledge, was insufficient for this purpose (Yaffe v. Shkreli, 187 AD3d 592, 592 [1st Dept 2020]; see also Mohamed v. Mohamed, 176 AD3d 567, 567–568 [1st Dept 2019]).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 2167
Decided: April 30, 2024
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)