Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Kenneth WEINSTEIN, Petitioner-Respondent-Appellant, v. The DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OF the CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent-Appellant-Respondent.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Sheila Abdus-Salaam, J.), entered January 16, 2004, which, in a proceeding pursuant to Education Law § 3020-a(5) and CPLR 7511 to vacate an Impartial Hearing Officer's determination, dated March 6, 2003, finding that petitioner teacher committed corporal punishment and that there is just cause for terminating his employment, granted the petition to the extent of remanding the matter to respondent for imposition of a lesser penalty and denied respondent's cross motion to dismiss the petition, unanimously modified, on the law, to grant the petition in its entirety, vacate the determination, and reinstate petitioner with back pay and benefits, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
Whatever the applicable standard of review in a compulsory arbitration proceeding, there is no rational basis in the evidence adduced for a finding that petitioner, a teacher with a 30-year history of exemplary service in the teaching profession, improperly used physical force against the complainant in violation of the regulations of the now Department of Education.
Even if there were any support for such a finding, under the circumstances, where petitioner was carrying out his assigned duty of denying access to a locker room to all but gym class students, we would agree with Supreme Court that the penalty imposed was excessive and shocking to one's conscience.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: June 09, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)