Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Guardianship, etc., ARISTOTLE G. and Another, Children Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Francisco G., Respondent-Appellant, v. Harlem Dowling-Westside Center for Children and Family Services, Petitioner-Respondent.
Orders of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Mary Bednar, J.), entered on or about May 14, 2001, which, to the extent appealed from, upon findings of permanent neglect, terminated respondent father's parental rights to the subject children and committed custody and guardianship of the children to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The record demonstrates clearly and convincingly that despite the agency's diligent efforts to reunite respondent with his children, respondent neglected the children by failing to plan for their future (see Matter of Selathia Nicole F., 243 A.D.2d 400, 663 N.Y.S.2d 183, lv. denied 91 N.Y.2d 806, 669 N.Y.S.2d 1, 691 N.E.2d 1027). Respondent, who was homeless and unemployed, made only sporadic attempts to find work and failed to contact agency referrals for job training.
Family Court's finding that it was in the best interests of the children to terminate respondent's parental rights and to free the children for adoption by their foster parent was supported by the requisite fair preponderance of the evidence (see Matter of Shaka Efion C., 207 A.D.2d 740, 741, 616 N.Y.S.2d 620). At the time of the dispositional hearing, respondent was still living in a shelter and unable to provide a suitable home. His interaction with his children was limited. The foster mother, on the other hand, had a loving relationship with the children and was able to address their needs, particularly the special needs of the older child, in whose prescribed therapeutic and medical course she actively participated.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 10, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)