Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. J.D. DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Mary McGowan Davis, J.), rendered October 14, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of auto stripping in the second degree, petit larceny, criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree and resisting arrest, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2 to 4 years concurrent with three concurrent terms of 1 year, unanimously affirmed.
Contrary to defendant's argument, the verdict convicting him of auto stripping was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the jury's determinations concerning credibility. The element of intent to destroy or deface a part of a vehicle was satisfied by ample evidence, including the extensive damage to the door lock on the complainant's car, which permitted the jury to infer that defendant intended the natural consequences of his acts.
The court properly declined to dismiss the auto stripping count, the only remedy ultimately requested by defendant, as a sanction for the inadvertent loss of photographs depicting the damage to the car. The court properly found that there was no prejudice to defendant, particularly because the People provided new photographs along with credible testimony that the substitute photographs depicted the same condition as the lost photographs. To the extent that defendant argues on appeal that the court should have imposed some unspecified alternative sanction, that argument is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would similarly reject it.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: March 28, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)