Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. JUSTIN JENKINS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the resentence so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: In appeal No. 1, defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of six counts of robbery in the second degree (Penal Law § 160.10 [2] [b]) and, in appeal No. 2, he appeals from a resentence on that conviction. We note at the outset that, inasmuch as the sentence in appeal No. 1 was superseded by the resentence in appeal No. 2, the appeal from the judgment in appeal No. 1 insofar as it imposed sentence must be dismissed (see People v Redar, 195 AD3d 1577, 1578 [4th Dept 2021], lv denied 37 NY3d 1029 [2021]; People v Weathington [appeal No. 2], 141 AD3d 1173, 1173 [4th Dept 2016]). We otherwise affirm the judgment in appeal No. 1 and affirm the resentence in appeal No. 2.
Defendant contends that the waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and that the resentence is unduly harsh and severe. Preliminarily, inasmuch as the sentencing conditions under which defendant agreed to waive the right to appeal did not change following the waiver obtained during the plea proceeding, his waiver of the right to appeal, if valid, would preclude his challenge to the severity of the resentence (see People v Jones, 219 AD3d 1666, 1666 [4th Dept 2023]; People v McCarthy, 145 AD3d 1572, 1573 [4th Dept 2016]; cf. People v Fortner [appeal No. 1], 203 AD3d 1690, 1690 [4th Dept 2022], lv denied 38 NY3d 1007 [2022]; People v Jirdon, 159 AD3d 1518, 1519 [4th Dept 2018]; People v Allen, 97 AD3d 1164, 1164 [4th Dept 2012], lv denied 19 NY3d 994 [2012]). Nonetheless, even assuming, arguendo, that defendant's waiver of the right to appeal is invalid (see generally People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545, 560-563 [2019], cert denied — US —, 140 S Ct 2634 [2020]) and thus does not preclude our review of his challenge to the severity of his resentence (see Jones, 219 AD3d at 1666), we conclude that the resentence is not unduly harsh or severe.
Entered: December 22, 2023
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 931
Decided: December 22, 2023
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)