Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Frank PITTELLI et al., Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. John MACGILLIVRAY et al., Defendants–Respondents.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Erika M. Edwards, J.), entered April 18, 2023, which granted defendants’ respective motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
In this medical malpractice action, plaintiffs claim that defendants failed to properly diagnose and treat a ruptured triceps tendon, and that the delay in diagnosis resulted in a loss of the chance of full recovery.
The court correctly found that defendants’ experts made a prima facie showing that defendant doctors did not deviate from good and accepted practice in their treatment of plaintiff (see Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320, 324, 508 N.Y.S.2d 923, 501 N.E.2d 572 [1986]). In opposition, plaintiffs failed to raise triable issues of fact.
Plaintiffs’ experts assert that defendants failed to perform a proper physical examination of plaintiff, but those assertions are essentially based on the proposition that defendant doctors were intentionally incorrect in their testimony concerning the relevant medical records and their notations therein, and without any record evidence in support of that contention (see Ramirez v. Cruz, 92 A.D.3d 533, 533, 938 N.Y.S.2d 540 [1st Dept. 2012]). The cases plaintiffs rely upon wherein the medical records contain diagnostic testing or other similar evidence supporting a claim of malpractice are distinguishable (see e.g. Shewbaran v. Laufer, 177 A.D.3d 510, 511, 111 N.Y.S.3d 601 [1st Dept. 2019]; Hernandez v. Eachempati, 190 A.D.3d 552, 553, 140 N.Y.S.3d 225 [1st Dept. 2021]).
Plaintiffs’ claim that the mechanism of plaintiff's fall warranted further investigation into the possibility of a triceps tendon rupture via MRI, i.e., a fall on outstretched hand followed by a “pop” noise, is also unsupported in the record, as none of plaintiff's medical records with either defendant doctors or other nonparty physicians seen by plaintiff contain such a description of the accident.
We have considered plaintiffs’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 1170
Decided: December 07, 2023
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)