Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ron SUMMERS, a/k/a Justin Jones, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert Seewald, J., at suppression hearing; Steven Lloyd Barrett, J., at jury trial and sentence), rendered October 27, 1995, convicting defendant of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent felony offender, to a term of 25 years to life, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. The identification procedure was not unduly suggestive, and was permissible because only minutes earlier the complainant had independently recognized defendant as the person who had robbed her three days earlier (see, People v. Brown, 235 A.D.2d 302, 652 N.Y.S.2d 710, lv. denied 89 N.Y.2d 1032, 659 N.Y.S.2d 862, 681 N.E.2d 1309; People v. Martindale, 202 A.D.2d 158, 608 N.Y.S.2d 183, lv. denied 83 N.Y.2d 912, 614 N.Y.S.2d 394, 637 N.E.2d 285).
The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant's motion for a mistrial based on alleged jury taint, following appropriate inquiry of each juror by the court and counsel, which revealed that none of the remaining jurors possessed a state of mind that would prevent the rendering of an impartial verdict (see, People v. Evans, 192 A.D.2d 337, 596 N.Y.S.2d 17, lv. denied 81 N.Y.2d 1072, 601 N.Y.S.2d 592, 619 N.E.2d 670).
Defendant's redacted arrest photograph was properly admitted to demonstrate the change, as established by the record, in defendant's appearance between the date of arrest and the time of trial (People v. Nogueras, 196 A.D.2d 448, 601 N.Y.S.2d 289, lv. denied 82 N.Y.2d 900, 610 N.Y.S.2d 167, 632 N.E.2d 477), and to rebut the defense position that the complainant had not accurately described and identified defendant as the robber (see, People v. Randall, 227 A.D.2d 131, 641 N.Y.S.2d 639, lv. denied 88 N.Y.2d 940, 647 N.Y.S.2d 174, 670 N.E.2d 458).
We perceive no abuse of discretion in sentencing.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 12, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)