Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: FALON P., A Child Alleged to be Abused. Angel P., Respondent-Appellant, Commissioner of Social Services, Petitioner-Respondent.
Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Marjory Fields, J.), entered on or about September 28, 1993, which, upon a fact-finding determination that respondent had sexually abused his daughter, discharged the child to the custody of her non-respondent mother under the supervision of the Child Welfare Administration (“CWA”) and directed that the father would have CWA-supervised visits with the child, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court's finding that respondent had sexually abused his daughter was supported by a preponderance of the evidence, primarily the credited testimony of the infant victim (In re Johnny O., 240 A.D.2d 179, 658 N.Y.S.2d 871). Moreover, the child's testimony was corroborated to a substantial degree by the testimony elicited during respondent's case.
Before the child was “sworn” as a witness, the court sufficiently ascertained that the 6-year-old was capable of distinguishing between the truth and lies. The court's exclusion of respondent from the courtroom during his daughter's testimony was appropriate under the circumstances since it was necessary to safeguard the child's well-being and did not function to deprive respondent of due process of law (Matter of Donna K., 132 A.D.2d 1004, 518 N.Y.S.2d 289). Respondent's counsel, who was present during the child's testimony, was allowed to consult with respondent before conducting his cross-examination (see, id.).
We have considered respondent's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: May 21, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)