Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: HAMO D., A Dependent Child Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Zinka D., etc., Respondent-Appellant, Louise Wise Services, et al., Petitioners-Respondents.
Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Myrna Martinez-Perez, J.), entered on or about February 1, 2002, terminating respondent's parental rights to the subject child and committing the child's guardianship and custody to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purposes of adoption, upon a finding of permanent neglect, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The agency was not required to show diligent efforts to strengthen the parental relationship because of respondent's failure for a near continuous period of 21 months to keep it apprised of her whereabouts (Social Services Law § 384-b[7][e][I]; Matter of A. Children, 236 A.D.2d 271, 653 N.Y.S.2d 342 [1997] ). Nevertheless, the agency did show, by clear and convincing evidence, that once contact was resumed, it made diligent attempts to assist respondent in overcoming the problems preventing reunification, including referrals to needed social services and an English language program, but that respondent did not cooperate with these efforts (Social Services Law § 384-b[7][c]; see Matter of Sheila G., 61 N.Y.2d 368, 385, 474 N.Y.S.2d 421, 462 N.E.2d 1139 [1984] ). It was not enough that respondent regularly visited the child prior to the filing of the petition (see Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 N.Y.2d 136, 142-143, 481 N.Y.S.2d 26, 470 N.E.2d 824 [1984] ). Termination of respondent's parental rights is in the best interests of the child, who has lived in the same nurturing foster home virtually since birth.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 07, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)