Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Joy GREENE, etc., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Mosella SIMMONS, et al., Defendants, Park Avenue Associates, LLC, Defendant-Appellant. [And a Third-Party Action].
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Anne E. Targum, J.), entered July 9, 2004, which denied the motion of defendant Park Avenue Associates, LLC (Park Avenue) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Park Avenue was a maintenance contractor for a codefendant that sold oil and boiler services to another codefendant, the owner of a building where plaintiff and her family lived. Plaintiff's infant decedent fell into a bathtub filled with scalding hot water, sustaining ultimately deadly injuries. Factual issues are raised on this record as to the extent of Park Avenue's obligations to maintain the building's boiler, whether it met its common-law duty toward the residents of that building to use ordinary care (see Galarza v. Pac. Steel Boiler Corp., 147 A.D.2d 527, 537 N.Y.S.2d 829 [1989] ), and whether a failure in the discharge of such duty as it had to the building residents was a substantial cause of the accident. The motion court correctly found triable issues based on the affidavit of plaintiff's expert. On the material issue of industry custom and practice (see e.g. Munzer v. Town of Hempstead, 8 A.D.3d 247, 777 N.Y.S.2d 307 [2004] ), the expert's affidavit was sufficiently detailed and grounded in relevant experience. Triable questions were raised, as well, by the deposition testimony of Park Avenue's employee, who performed work at the home where plaintiff and her family lived, and who stated that the safety device known as a mixing valve was a part of the boiler, for which Park Avenue was responsible, and was routinely included in every boiler installation that he had seen.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 21, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)